California lawyer claims that he wrote a document, and then missed it through AI to improve. He did not check the results. After all, the AI seemed to him an ideal assistant.
The lawyer defending the client, he appealed in the labor legislation case, writes Xrust. However, the judges established that 21 cases of similar cases are a fake. There are no such things. They were invented by AI. Part of his evidence is associated with the wording, which in the affairs he mentioned is not at all. Femis fined a lawyer for $ 10,000.
It is obvious that reading the sources of law that he refers to appeals is the fundamental obligation of lawyers, , the judge said in his decision. Obviously, the lawyer did not read the cases he quoted before submitting appeals: if he read them, then, like us, would find that there are no formulations that he allegedly quoted, the cited provisions are not confirmed or do not exist at all .
Xrust, the lawyer was fined for quoting 21 fake business — they created AI
- Если Вам понравилась статья, рекомендуем почитать
- Apple is developing new features for the iPhone using satellite communications
- The court will deal with Tesla due to the unsuccessful design of door handles
