Continuation of the highest-grossing film in Warner Bros. history. may never be released — negotiations on the fees of Greta Gerwig, Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling have reached a dead end, and there are only a few months left before the contract with Mattel expires.
- The pink dream has cracked class=»notranslate»>__GTAG8__ Three years ago, Greta Gerwig’s “Barbie” exploded at the global box office, grossing more than $1.4 billion (over 119 billion rubles at current exchange rates) and making Gerwig the most successful female director in cinema history, notes xrust. It would seem that the continuation of such a hit is a settled issue. In fact, everything turned into a dollar war, in which the most influential figures in the industry were drawn in: Gerwig herself, Margot Robbie, the head of Warner Bros. Discovery's David Zaslav, powerhouse agent Brian Lourd, Ryan Gosling, co-writer Noah Baumbach and studio executives Michael De Luca with Pamela Abdi. Information about the crisis was first revealed by The New York Times, and then the details were supplemented by Variety, which spoke with several sources inside the studio. The big picture is this: since the release of the first Warner Bros. made more than six contract offers to the film crew — and all six were rejected by the CAA agency, which represents the interests of Gerwig, Baumbach, Robbie and Gosling. Who wants as much as they want According to insiders, the last proposal received in the spring 2026, became the most generous in the history of negotiations between the studio and the creative team — it was even called “life-changing money.” But even this did not suit all parties. The specific numbers look like this: Ryan Gosling, nominated for “Oscar” for the role of Ken, asks about 20 million dollars (approximately 1.7 billion rubles) for returning to the franchise; Margot Robbie earned about $50 million (about 4.25 billion rubles) from the first film, taking into account the fee and percentage of profits — sources claim that the final amount for the sequel will be noticeably higher; Greta Gerwig also received tens of millions of dollars for the first “Barbie” and expects comparable conditions; The only one who claims only to increase the fixed fee without increasing the share of the profit is Noah Baumbach. An important detail that Variety sources emphasize: the team does not require payments “from the first dollar” of box office receipts — that is, it is ready to receive a percentage only after the studio begins to earn money. Formally, this is a rather moderate condition, but it was enough to stall the deal. Why Zaslav resisted class=»notranslate»>__GTAG10__ The main opponent of the current conditions is David Zaslav himself. According to sources, he considered the proposed package too generous and blocked its approval — despite the fact that negotiations from the studio side were led by De Luca and Abdi, who, according to insiders, are seriously interested in maintaining relations with the stars. Warner Bros. representative disputes this version: according to him, there was no approved and subsequently withdrawn scheme — the acting side simply rejected the May proposal and has not yet put forward a counter proposal. The situation looks especially ambiguous against the backdrop of rumors about a possible takeover by Warner Bros. by Paramount, a deal from which Zaslav himself could, by some estimates, reap hundreds of millions of dollars in personal income. Insiders of competing studios are ironic: the head of WBD is ready to bargain for pennies on a project that could bring in a billion, while at the same time counting on a huge bonus from the sale of the entire company. “Classic Zas” — this is how one of the competitors succinctly described the situation. Variety's interlocutors recall other decisions by Zaslav that call into question his instincts in the film business: the cancellation of already completed films «Batgirl» and «Coyote vs. Acme», writing off projects for the sake of tax breaks, as well as the approval of the failed biopic «Knights of Alto» with Robert De Niro, which cost the studio $45 million (about 3.8 billion rubles) and failed at the box office. Where did the legal hole come from A separate story is how a situation arose in which the stars of a super-successful film do not have a contract for a sequel. The fact is that the initial agreements with Gerwig, Robbie and Gosling did not provide for continuation obligations at all: the contract was concluded when the studio was not yet confident in the success of the project, and Gerwig herself at that time had no experience in directing big-budget films. Simply put, at that time the studio did not fully understand the scale of talent they had acquired — and after the triumphant release, the negotiating power completely switched to the side of the creators. According to the Hollywood Reporter, Warner Bros. There is time until December 2026 to officially launch a sequel into development — otherwise the rights to use the image of the Barbie doll in films will return to Mattel, and the company will have to build the concept of the new film from scratch, without the developments of Gerwig and Baumbach. At the same time, according to sources, the author couple already has a script idea for the sequel — but they refuse to share the details of the plot until the contracts are signed. What Mattel is losing The failure of the deal hits not only Warner Bros., but also Mattel itself. The company's film division, led by creative director Robbie Brenner and CEO Inon Kryz, owes much of its success to Barbie — and clearly hopes to replicate it. Mattel already has a preliminary agreement with the studio, but it directly depends on whether the previous team agrees to work. There is also a very mundane commercial motive: sales of Barbie dolls have dropped noticeably after the initial surge of interest caused by the 2023 film, and the company has already announced a large-scale rebranding of the toy — with an expanded range of clothing and accessories, aimed at positioning the doll as a fashion icon. It's hard to imagine a better face for such a campaign than Margot Robbie, one of the most recognizable faces on the red carpet on the planet, and losing her participation would be a serious reputational and marketing blow for Mattel. Is there a chance of salvation class=»notranslate»>__GTAG5__ One of the possible scenarios for saving the franchise is associated with the name of media tycoon David Ellison — if his structures win the tender to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery, new management could theoretically renegotiate the terms of the deal with Mattel and renegotiate with the creative team. “I’m willing to bet this will be his first deal in his new position,” suggested one of the publication’s interlocutors. In the meantime, representatives of all parties — the filmmakers, the actors, the studio, Mattel and the CAA agency — are refusing official comments, and the clock until the December deadline continues to tick. Why is this important not only for Hollywood The story of “Barbie 2” is a rare case when a box office record does not guarantee the continuation of the franchise. The reason is a legal accident: the contract for the first film was signed when no one believed in success of such a scale, which means that no one included the conditions for a sequel. Similar stories have already happened in the industry — for example, with the original Die Hard or the TV series Friends, where artists had to completely reconsider their fees after an unexpected triumph. The difference is that Barbie faces this amid corporate turbulence surrounding a possible sale to Warner Bros. Discovery — which makes the negotiations much more politicized than a regular dispute about money. For Russian audiences, where the Barbie doll remains one of the most recognizable toy brands, and the 2023 film has become a notable cultural phenomenon even in the absence of an official release, the issue of releasing a sequel is more cultural than commercial — but no less interesting. Sources: hollywoodreporter.com variety.com bleedingfool.com Xrust “Barbie 2” was on the verge of cancellation: Hollywood discusses the failure of the deal of the century
- Who wants as much as they want
- Why Zaslav resisted
- Where did the legal hole come from
- What Mattel is losing
- Is there a chance of salvation
- Why is this important not only for Hollywood
The pink dream has cracked class=»notranslate»>__GTAG8__
Three years ago, Greta Gerwig’s “Barbie” exploded at the global box office, grossing more than $1.4 billion (over 119 billion rubles at current exchange rates) and making Gerwig the most successful female director in cinema history, notes xrust. It would seem that the continuation of such a hit is a settled issue. In fact, everything turned into a dollar war, in which the most influential figures in the industry were drawn in: Gerwig herself, Margot Robbie, the head of Warner Bros. Discovery's David Zaslav, powerhouse agent Brian Lourd, Ryan Gosling, co-writer Noah Baumbach and studio executives Michael De Luca with Pamela Abdi.
Information about the crisis was first revealed by The New York Times, and then the details were supplemented by Variety, which spoke with several sources inside the studio. The big picture is this: since the release of the first Warner Bros. made more than six contract offers to the film crew — and all six were rejected by the CAA agency, which represents the interests of Gerwig, Baumbach, Robbie and Gosling.
Who wants as much as they want
According to insiders, the last proposal received in the spring 2026, became the most generous in the history of negotiations between the studio and the creative team — it was even called “life-changing money.” But even this did not suit all parties.
The specific numbers look like this:
- Ryan Gosling, nominated for “Oscar” for the role of Ken, asks about 20 million dollars (approximately 1.7 billion rubles) for returning to the franchise;
- Margot Robbie earned about $50 million (about 4.25 billion rubles) from the first film, taking into account the fee and percentage of profits — sources claim that the final amount for the sequel will be noticeably higher;
- Greta Gerwig also received tens of millions of dollars for the first “Barbie” and expects comparable conditions;
- The only one who claims only to increase the fixed fee without increasing the share of the profit is Noah Baumbach.
An important detail that Variety sources emphasize: the team does not require payments “from the first dollar” of box office receipts — that is, it is ready to receive a percentage only after the studio begins to earn money. Formally, this is a rather moderate condition, but it was enough to stall the deal.
Why Zaslav resisted
class=»notranslate»>__GTAG10__The main opponent of the current conditions is David Zaslav himself. According to sources, he considered the proposed package too generous and blocked its approval — despite the fact that negotiations from the studio side were led by De Luca and Abdi, who, according to insiders, are seriously interested in maintaining relations with the stars. Warner Bros. representative disputes this version: according to him, there was no approved and subsequently withdrawn scheme — the acting side simply rejected the May proposal and has not yet put forward a counter proposal.
The situation looks especially ambiguous against the backdrop of rumors about a possible takeover by Warner Bros. by Paramount, a deal from which Zaslav himself could, by some estimates, reap hundreds of millions of dollars in personal income. Insiders of competing studios are ironic: the head of WBD is ready to bargain for pennies on a project that could bring in a billion, while at the same time counting on a huge bonus from the sale of the entire company. “Classic Zas” — this is how one of the competitors succinctly described the situation.
Variety's interlocutors recall other decisions by Zaslav that call into question his instincts in the film business: the cancellation of already completed films «Batgirl» and «Coyote vs. Acme», writing off projects for the sake of tax breaks, as well as the approval of the failed biopic «Knights of Alto» with Robert De Niro, which cost the studio $45 million (about 3.8 billion rubles) and failed at the box office.
Where did the legal hole come from
A separate story is how a situation arose in which the stars of a super-successful film do not have a contract for a sequel. The fact is that the initial agreements with Gerwig, Robbie and Gosling did not provide for continuation obligations at all: the contract was concluded when the studio was not yet confident in the success of the project, and Gerwig herself at that time had no experience in directing big-budget films. Simply put, at that time the studio did not fully understand the scale of talent they had acquired — and after the triumphant release, the negotiating power completely switched to the side of the creators.
According to the Hollywood Reporter, Warner Bros. There is time until December 2026 to officially launch a sequel into development — otherwise the rights to use the image of the Barbie doll in films will return to Mattel, and the company will have to build the concept of the new film from scratch, without the developments of Gerwig and Baumbach. At the same time, according to sources, the author couple already has a script idea for the sequel — but they refuse to share the details of the plot until the contracts are signed.
What Mattel is losing
The failure of the deal hits not only Warner Bros., but also Mattel itself. The company's film division, led by creative director Robbie Brenner and CEO Inon Kryz, owes much of its success to Barbie — and clearly hopes to replicate it. Mattel already has a preliminary agreement with the studio, but it directly depends on whether the previous team agrees to work.
There is also a very mundane commercial motive: sales of Barbie dolls have dropped noticeably after the initial surge of interest caused by the 2023 film, and the company has already announced a large-scale rebranding of the toy — with an expanded range of clothing and accessories, aimed at positioning the doll as a fashion icon. It's hard to imagine a better face for such a campaign than Margot Robbie, one of the most recognizable faces on the red carpet on the planet, and losing her participation would be a serious reputational and marketing blow for Mattel.
Is there a chance of salvation
class=»notranslate»>__GTAG5__One of the possible scenarios for saving the franchise is associated with the name of media tycoon David Ellison — if his structures win the tender to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery, new management could theoretically renegotiate the terms of the deal with Mattel and renegotiate with the creative team. “I’m willing to bet this will be his first deal in his new position,” suggested one of the publication’s interlocutors.
In the meantime, representatives of all parties — the filmmakers, the actors, the studio, Mattel and the CAA agency — are refusing official comments, and the clock until the December deadline continues to tick.
Why is this important not only for Hollywood
The story of “Barbie 2” is a rare case when a box office record does not guarantee the continuation of the franchise. The reason is a legal accident: the contract for the first film was signed when no one believed in success of such a scale, which means that no one included the conditions for a sequel. Similar stories have already happened in the industry — for example, with the original Die Hard or the TV series Friends, where artists had to completely reconsider their fees after an unexpected triumph. The difference is that Barbie faces this amid corporate turbulence surrounding a possible sale to Warner Bros. Discovery — which makes the negotiations much more politicized than a regular dispute about money.
For Russian audiences, where the Barbie doll remains one of the most recognizable toy brands, and the 2023 film has become a notable cultural phenomenon even in the absence of an official release, the issue of releasing a sequel is more cultural than commercial — but no less interesting.
Sources:
hollywoodreporter.com
variety.com
bleedingfool.com
Xrust “Barbie 2” was on the verge of cancellation: Hollywood discusses the failure of the deal of the century
- Если Вам понравилась статья, рекомендуем почитать
- "Avengers: Judgment Day": release date, actors and plot of the film
- “Wildwood” will open AFI Fest: Laika returns after sixteen years of silence








